Data can be interpreted without making assumptions. It can be interpreted in the light of all the other tests and observations that have gone on before. You seem to think "if we haven't done all the work ourselves, then everything we haven't touched personally is an assumption." I'm afraid you'd be wrong there.
And you seem to be making assumptions about what I'm thinking. You so busy creating straw men out of whole cloth that you apparently don't have time to read what I actually wrote.
Either you're so dumb you're willing to accept what's written in an article ABOUT some research without reading the research itself, or you're just a koolaide drinking evolutionist who never learned to think for himself.
Got a link, or not? Yes or no, or don't bother to reply.