Ask any lawyer about "evidence". It is indeed the interpretation that matters. You surely aren't saying scientists always agree with the evidence, are you? Because you know that would be a lie.
Ask any jury about evidence. We are well past the point of any informed, reasonable person having reasonable doubt about the evidence for evolution.
You surely aren't saying scientists always agree with the evidence, are you?
I don't know what that means. Scientists don't "agree" or "disagree" with evidence -- evidence is evidence, it is not an argument, it simply exists.