To: PatrickHenry
Well, according tho what I read...it's still a frog. What did the frog evolve into? Not a very strong case for evolution.
If ignorance were only painful...
22 posted on
11/02/2005 11:26:02 AM PST by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: Conservativehomeschoolmama
Well, according tho what I read...it's still a frog. What did the frog evolve into? Not a very strong case for evolution.
Not all frogs are alike: Over several thousand years, this behavior created a reproductively isolated population - essentially a new species - that is unable to mate with either of the original frog populations.
24 posted on
11/02/2005 11:28:44 AM PST by
BikerNYC
(Modernman should not have been banned.)
To: Conservativehomeschoolmama
"Well, according tho what I read...it's still a frog. What did the frog evolve into? Not a very strong case for evolution." Actually it's a very good example of evolution. What it is not a good example of is the creationist strawman version of evolution. Tell me, what would you accept as a good example of speciation?
33 posted on
11/02/2005 11:35:44 AM PST by
b_sharp
(Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
To: Conservativehomeschoolmama
Give 'em a break, will ya? In another 8,000,000 years they'll be doing calculus and driving cars.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson