Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Principled
Simple answer to you and the other farttaxers. BS. BTW, the pre-index argument is the silver dagger into the heart of the dark monster that the farttaxt certainly is.

You can't make claims on purchasing power based on alleged facts not yet placed in evidence.
23 posted on 11/02/2005 1:35:54 PM PST by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Final Authority; All
BTW, the pre-index argument is the silver dagger into the heart of the dark monster that the farttaxt certainly is.

For myself, I'm willing to go through ANYTHING to shove a "dagger in the heart" (Chuckie Schumer's favorite phrase, BTW) of THE OLD INCOME TAX for the sake of my kids, grandkids and the future of this great country of ours, in case things don't work out quite the way it's hoped (Do you want a COMPLETELY ACCURATE crystal ball?  WTFKOFAYA?) Whatever, it will kick the American economy into hyper-overdrive within 2 years if not sooner, and I'm not so mean-spirited as to put everyone else through more hell just so I won't have to suffer that long.
 

So when I go to the store to buy a $100 coat, will I now have to pay $123?

The short answer is, No.  The longer answer is also No, but it depends on what exactly you mean by the question.

     If you're asking whether a $100 coat you see for sale before passage of the FairTax Plan will cost $123 under the Plan, the answer is no because -- as you'll remember from previous chapters -- that $100 price is already inflated by 22 percent worth of embedded tax.  Once those embedded taxes fall away, the 23 percent FairTax will bring the price right back to the $100 level.

     If you're asking whether a $100 coat you see for sale after passage of the FairTax will actually set you back $123, the answer is no because the FairTax was designed as what's called an "inclusive" tax -- that is, the tax is included in the list price of the product.  When you go to the store and purchase an item for $100, in other words, the retailer will get $77; the remaining $23 is paid to the federal government.  This is the biggest difference between the FairTax and most current state sales taxes, which are "exclusive" -- that is, added to the price of the merchandise at the time of the sale.  Since our current income taxes are figured on an inclusive basis -- that is, they are taken out of our paychecks, not added to them -- it was decided to handle the sales tax in exactly the same manner.

-- "Questions and Objections," The FairTax Book, pages 150-151
 

also see:  FairTax FAQ #17


<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>

Find all 35 ways to LISTEN|to|BOORtz over the web 
including evenings and weekends -- HERE:
http://FreedomKeys.com/boortzcast.htm

<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>


25 posted on 11/02/2005 2:41:17 PM PST by FreeKeys ("Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence." -- Israel Regardie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Final Authority

"You can't make claims on purchasing power based on alleged facts not yet placed in evidence."

Say what? Is this a courtroom? What are your rules of evidence, Your Honor?


31 posted on 11/02/2005 3:01:35 PM PST by phil_will1 (My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Final Authority
Simple answer to you and the other farttaxers. BS.

Ooohhhh! Good one! Simple, to be sure, but not any answer.

You deny the existence of tax costs in the prices of goods and services today - and you want to be taken seriously?

33 posted on 11/02/2005 4:57:38 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson