Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUMPY FRUMP A FASHION DISASTER (why don't they leave the poor girl alone, already)
NY POST ^ | 11/2/05 | ORLA HEALY

Posted on 11/02/2005 4:17:48 AM PST by Liz


REGAL ROSES: Bearing flowers, Charles and Camilla visit Hanover Square, where they left a tribute to British 9/11 victims. Photo: AFP/Getty

Diana would be amused. Her successor and former rival, Camilla Parker Bowles, failed spectacularly in her attempt to wow Manhattan society with her sartorial splendor last night.

Dressed in an unflattering Anthony Price navy velvet frock with a fussy oversized chiffon collar, the Duchess of Cornwall arrived at a chi-chi cocktail party looking more like an escapee from the choirboy pew of Westminister Abbey than the guest of honor.

Earlier, Camilla caused quite a stir when she chose an eye-popping raspberry suit for her visit to Ground Zero.

We predict an "off-with-their-heads" ruling to come down on the core team who were supposed to create the "Camilla Chic" glamour on this trip..... and "a secret dresser," whose identity is fast becoming a gag in fashion circles.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: badhair; camilla; cattyclaws; charlieandhisskank; fugly; horseface; meow; nostatedinner; royal; royals; royalvisit; yurpeens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-268 next last
To: Liz
"Charles, I'm calling to say that these Americans are mean. They are making fun at the way I look. Why is that, Charles? Why???"


121 posted on 11/02/2005 6:53:23 AM PST by Maximus of Texas (On my signal, pull my finger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tuffydoodle

Charles and Camilla are both well suited. Both ugly and as boring as hell! BTW not all Brits talk, walk or dress like that! LOL


Anyone notice I am not a fan of the Royalty! : )
I did love Princess Di though and met her twice in hospital. She was the Best of the bunch by far.


122 posted on 11/02/2005 6:59:12 AM PST by Rose of Sharn (I get the best answers when I talk to myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Maximus of Texas

ROFL! That horse is WAY too good looking!


123 posted on 11/02/2005 7:02:43 AM PST by Rose of Sharn (I get the best answers when I talk to myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Even people of good character can have bad style sense. In guess in Camilla's case, she has neither.

Attacking her looks is ... tacky.

124 posted on 11/02/2005 7:04:01 AM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mayflower Sister

Hmm. I like the midnight blue, but this has "Hey New York, I'm like Diana" all over it.


125 posted on 11/02/2005 7:07:00 AM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rose of Sharn

Rose, I apologize for pocking fun at your Royalty. I know they still hold a special place in your heart, especially that place where UK'ers pay billions of dollars to support the royal family each year.


126 posted on 11/02/2005 7:08:38 AM PST by Maximus of Texas (On my signal, pull my finger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
"Well, at least Camilla's 25 pounds are spread over her frame. She's very athletic looking, fit and quite pretty for a sixtyish woman. Unlike Hillary whose extra 25 (chortle, snort) are spread equally over each calf and distributed in great lumps over her hips. Thank goodness Camilla doesn't wear black pantsuits... "

Perfect!

An excellent description of Camilla and a PERFECT description of Hillary!

127 posted on 11/02/2005 7:11:32 AM PST by albee ("Those that bite the hand that feeds them will lick the boot that kicks them!" - Eric Hoffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Maximus of Texas

"Blucher!"


128 posted on 11/02/2005 7:14:19 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Miss Behave

Splendid of you old chap!


129 posted on 11/02/2005 7:15:25 AM PST by britemp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Maximus of Texas

You are so right. I miss paying for their fancy houses and fancy cars and 'social' engagements.
I miss paying for all that fine jewelry that I will never get a chance to wear.
All those luxury vacations that I never got a chance to go on.
Yep, I miss paying taxes out of hard earned money to support the Royals. They are SO worth it. : (


130 posted on 11/02/2005 7:15:57 AM PST by Rose of Sharn (I get the best answers when I talk to myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

"Ovaltine?"


131 posted on 11/02/2005 7:27:30 AM PST by tuffydoodle (Shut up voices, or I'll poke you with a Q-Tip again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

Unnecessarily cruel, don't you think? Or is it something personal between you and Camilla?


132 posted on 11/02/2005 7:28:55 AM PST by doberville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner

. . .'I am sure that Charles is a better action man than he is a thinking man. '. . .

A feature he undoubtedly shares with your President. I have yet to hear HRH sing the glory of Islam, yet as a future monarch he has the responsibility to represent all his citizens, even the catholics that the whole country will be burning effigies of on November 5th! Britain as a country also has a responsibility to most of the worlds muslim countries as their borders were drawn up by us under the auspices of empire, yet still the muslim population of the UK is less than 3%. What we must all remember is that muslims are not the enemy, terrorists are. For all muslims to be branded enemy because of the acts of a few of their brethren is as ridiculous and counter-productive as for me to brand all Americans terrorists because a few idiotic ones supported Irish terrorists in their murder of soldiers and democratically elected politicians.


133 posted on 11/02/2005 7:28:59 AM PST by britemp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Maximus of Texas; Rose of Sharn

Max, now you stop that pocking. You can only do that in private.


134 posted on 11/02/2005 7:29:09 AM PST by tuffydoodle (Shut up voices, or I'll poke you with a Q-Tip again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: tuffydoodle

And when your inflatable Lady Di is functional.


135 posted on 11/02/2005 7:30:42 AM PST by Maximus of Texas (On my signal, pull my finger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Mayflower Sister

She was a nitwit!


136 posted on 11/02/2005 7:31:38 AM PST by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Maximus of Texas

How did you know about my inflatable Lady Di?!?!


137 posted on 11/02/2005 7:32:29 AM PST by tuffydoodle (Shut up voices, or I'll poke you with a Q-Tip again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: ariamne

The Monarch is Defender of the Faith, that is, Defender of protestant anglicanism. That excludes catholics, jews, muslims, hindus etc.

Charles has already said that he intends to be 'Defender of the Faiths' to reflect the wider range of religious beliefs in the UK and to encompass the catholic, the jew and the muslim amongst others.


138 posted on 11/02/2005 7:35:26 AM PST by britemp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: britemp
What we must all remember is that muslims are not the enemy, terrorists are. For all muslims to be branded enemy because of the acts of a few of their brethren is as ridiculous and counter-productive

One question: When did this government do any such thing?

If Charles comes out with a high-handed remark like that, his royal butt can scoot right back to Britain, and we won't hold the screen door for him. (Unless he's too dumb to do it himself.)

139 posted on 11/02/2005 7:35:41 AM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Rose of Sharn
Charles and Camilla are both well suited. Both ugly and as boring as hell! BTW not all Brits talk, walk or dress like that! LOL

That's probably because, unlike the royals, they aren't German.

140 posted on 11/02/2005 7:36:14 AM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-268 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson