Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ga. Senate committee drafting bill to extend landowner rights
The Macon Telegraph ^ | Nov. 02, 2005

Posted on 11/02/2005 4:03:20 AM PST by deaconjim

ATLANTA - When environmental or zoning regulations impinge on landowners' rights to use their property, the government should either pay landowners or abandon the regulations, according to Sen. Chip Pearson, R-Dawsonville, chair of the Senate Inverse Condemnation Committee.

The committee, which held a hearing Tuesday and comprises five Republicans and two Democrats, plans to draft a bill to introduce in January that would to protect property owners from what Pearson called "over-regulation."

For example, state rules forbid landowners along Yahoola Creek in Lumpkin County to build within 150 feet of the banks, to prevent pollution in the stream. Pearson said the buffer zone devalues those properties and prevents owners from using land on which they still have to pay taxes.

Opponents of the proposed legislation said neither state or local governments would have enough money to pay for all the land that falls under regulations and could become contested.

Owners of neighboring properties could also be damaged by use of land that had previously been off-limit to development, according to Jim Grubiak, general counsel of the Association County Commissioners of Georgia.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: propertyrights; zoninglaws
Isn't it amazing what can happen when you replace a democrat majority with Republicans?

Opponents of the proposed legislation said neither state or local governments would have enough money to pay for all the land that falls under regulations and could become contested.

It doens't bother them that the landowners can't afford to pay for all the land that falls under those regulations.
1 posted on 11/02/2005 4:03:21 AM PST by deaconjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: deaconjim

It's completely repugnant to a democratic republic and its citizens that unelected bureaucrats are given power to write law. Only an elected legislature has legitimate power to legislate. That legislatures have allowed bureaucrats to write law and the courts have assented to this farce shows how far we've travelled from individual property rights and original intent.

Unaccountable bureaucrats writing law is one of the signatures of totalitarianism. In former communist Russia, bureaucrats were given power to write law on the regional and local level to carry out the goals of the state for the Marxist "common good." These unelected councils were called "soviets."

The eco-fascists are attempting to control private property in this country by establishing unelected regional planning commissions. They want to import totalitarianism and see these "soviets" overlay and control all land in America.

Georgia is engaged in a lawful second revolution, and re-capturing what's been lost. Good for you.


2 posted on 11/02/2005 4:31:28 AM PST by sergeantdave (Member of the Arbor Day Foundation, travelling the country and destroying open space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deaconjim

Here in Maryland we have what they call " Critical areas" around the bay and its tributaries.. All well and good I suppose until you face the zoning board. I wont go on about it but suffice to say you cannot legally trim a tree without permission in this area , and God forbid you should cut one. By the way the setback here is 1,000 feet.

You see legislators make the laws but its the bureaucrats who make the regulations. The laws you can get changed , the regulations you are stuck with. The bureaucrats laugh at the legislators.


3 posted on 11/02/2005 4:39:24 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deaconjim

Point of order: the government cannot "extend landowners' rights," as those are G-d-given and inalienable. They can merely limit government infringement/increase government protection of rights.


4 posted on 11/02/2005 7:12:38 AM PST by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ellery

Great point.


5 posted on 11/02/2005 12:56:13 PM PST by deaconjim (Can I be on the Supreme Court too? Can I, can I? Pleeeeeeeeeeeeze?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

Wouldn't it be great to see this happen at the federal level? I'm dreaming I know, but you have to have dreams...


6 posted on 11/03/2005 5:15:14 AM PST by deaconjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson