Replies

And he was alone when he went to meet the secretary and the officers? LOL. Someone involved in this situation should actually read 720 ILCS 5/25-1(a).

You mean

(720 ILCS 5/25‑1) (from Ch. 38, par. 25‑1)

Sec. 25‑1. Mob action.

(a) Mob action consists of any of the following:
(1) The use of force or violence disturbing the public peace by 2 or more persons acting together and without authority of law; or
(2) The assembly of 2 or more persons to do an unlawful act; or
(3) The assembly of 2 or more persons, without authority of law, for the purpose of doing violence to the person or property of any one supposed to have been guilty of a violation of the law, or for the purpose of exercising correctional powers or regulative powers over any person by violence.

Is that the section he's charged under? Is he accused of having split personality disorder or what? Or did someone mistype 720 ILCS 5/26-1(a)?

You may be right. 720 ILCS 5/26-1(a) does seem to be the more relevant charge, when it is read absent the relevant case law.

I won't make a statement, on FR or anywhere else, that could be construed as practicing law without a license. It appears from the OP that the defendant here is adequately represented by counsel. However, if a poster here is in personal contact with the defendant and he needs further assistance, please PM me and I will let you know how I may be able to help.