Replies

There's some squirrelly stuff going on here.

Read this from bottom up: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/user-posts?name=MD4Bush

While this exposes a charicature of a conservative as a talented lefty trying to act conservative would portray himself as, there's more.

This is the first post that mentions O'Malley (publicly, as opposed to FReepMail): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1174344/posts

This thread drags in xcullen and for some reason theheadman replies on this thread 9 months after the fact, at a time when the whole affair was at a certain boiling point: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1174344/posts?page=92#92

Here's the line on xcullen: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/user-posts?name=xcullen

Read from it what you will, but I'd like to hear what he got in freepmail prior to this post because the history looks pretty legit. Don't know much about xcullen, myself.

Here's theheadman: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/user-posts?name=theheadman

One post. One time. Defending MD4Bush. Looks like damage control to me.

Note also that MD4Bush seems to put some effort into discrediting Keyes. Perhaps he thought it was worth some effort at the time, despite the fact Keyes was pretty much a non-player by then.

Also tries to discredit Rove, repeatedly, and uses the alleged Rove example to claim "We need this kinda stuff in MD". and later this: " But I read some of your comments about Keyes you said you work on a lot of campaigns and in MD doing special ops, reminded me of Rove."

Would love to know more about the removed comment in this thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1252516/posts

Also tries to bait the slime in this post about Mikulski: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1258921/posts?page=19#19

Couldn't resist praising Clinton here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1274611/posts?page=25#25

Gloats about political damage to Kerick here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1300213/posts?page=71#71