But it is a common tactic used by the religious evolution zealots, metmom.
Ridicule without substance, all the while claiming to be intellectually honest and 'scientific.'
It is, IMO, a response of one afraid of the challenge to one's faith.
"That's not evidence, it's ridicule. And it does nothing to support the claim that there was no design.
But it is a common tactic used by the religious evolution zealots, metmom."
You need evidence in order to teach something. If you want to teach that there was a lost city of Altantis in history class there should be historical evidence.
Before you teach that God did something, in a science class, you should have scientific evidence.
You don't teach everything you cannot disprove. There are lots of things we cannot disprove. We cant disprove ghosts or aliens or demonic possession or that the CIA killed Kennedy but we don't teach them without appropriate evidence.