Anyone can challenge anything but you are missing the point. What does the TTSS do?
I maybe missing Dembski’s point, but it looks like those who specialize in it on those forums aren’t and aren’t anywhere near stumped by it. John Pieret in Metaphors on Trial or, How did the Groundhog Cross the Road? calls it a three card monte game of metaphors.
Since the larger point of ID is that evolution is impossible, and refuted work like that by Dembski and a few others are its only “evidence”, ID looks to be without evidence.
Like I said, I’m not available give such technical discussions the attention required, but I’m sure some of the people on those forums I linked to would love to hear from you if that’s what you study and debate. If you give me a link to your posts there, and I’ll promote them here.