[Tailgunner Joe]

All you have to do to prove ID is wrong is show that irreducible complexity does not exist in nature.

[Roots]

All you have to do to prove ID is wrong is show that irreducible complexity does not exist in nature.

ID is not falsifiable! NO! That's like saying "all you have to do is disprove Christianity and it'll all go away", of course it can't be disproven, that's why IT IS NOT A SCIENCE!

[MHalblaub]

"All you have to do to prove ID is wrong is show that irreducible complexity does not exist in nature."

So you made two fatal errors in one statement:

1. To prove something by showing something doesn't exist is impossible. Therefore this won't count as a possible method to disprove ID.
(I would call that the running ID gap. "Sorry, Mr. Behe that system isn't IC." - "Tata! Here is another IC system.")

2. ID first have to show that IC systems are only possible via ID. Therefore the existence of IC systems is no proof of ID.