Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jec1ny
The empirical force of theories is on a sliding scale, and aspects within the theory have their own sliding scale. I would suggest and assert that emphasing what is unknown is equally as important as what is known. A belief in certainly where none exists can lead to hubris.

Do I believe in intelligent design? No. I am a near atheist. Do I believe there is any empirical evidence for it that is testable by the scientific method? No. Are there some elements of the evolutionary theory that will be so testable in my lifetime? No. Will we discover the origin of life in my lifetime, as it were, via the scientific method? No. So what?

48 posted on 11/01/2005 7:27:51 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
Do I believe there is any empirical evidence for it that is testable by the scientific method? No.

Charles Darwin disagreed. He said, "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."

Intelligent Design Theory can be tested by demonstrating that irreducible complexity exists in nature.

57 posted on 11/01/2005 7:34:19 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: Torie
A belief in certainly where none exists can lead to hubris.

hmmm. In certainty where none exists...

How are you certain that or where none exists?

Cordially,

311 posted on 11/07/2005 8:58:07 AM PST by Diamond (Qui liberatio scelestus trucido inculpatus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson