I notice a high correlation between criticism of evolution and ignorance of its basic principles. When a critic starts an argument by saying Evolution is predicated on an hypothesis that the moon is made of green cheese, nothing worthwhile is likely to follow.
It's made of Gorgonzola. I thought everyone knew that.
Dunno. A good sub-thread might follow on the relative merits of different types of green cheese, and if green paint on cheese counts.;->
We should keep two issues distinct: (a) the criticism of evolution and (b) the qaulity of communication between disparate levels of ability of understanding.
If evolution does not concern itself with this feature, something else does. Or is it that you wish to deny the existence of complexity?
My general goal has been to stick to learning and education rather than turning another's loss into a side-show sport. I think it helps build a character of patience, which is greatly needed in an ambitious and adolescent world.