Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal Politicians Pro War Comments Leading Into Iraq
http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp

Posted on 11/01/2005 3:04:27 PM PST by mark in iowa

Show these to your liberal friends lest they forget so eaisly.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seing and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do." Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ... Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/01/2005 3:04:28 PM PST by mark in iowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mark in iowa

The libs have slid so far to the left, they are immersed in a flood of hypocrisy. Now just pure troublemakers and liars, they serve no useful purpose to America. They are major detractors, obstructionists, and criminals.


2 posted on 11/01/2005 3:06:22 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

1. Remind the left that every single Democrat of note said in 1998 that Iraq's WMD posed a danger to the United States.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/972389/posts

2. Remind the left that Clinton's Justice Department obtained a federal indictment of Osama bin Laden which stated that AQ had a deal with Iraq. They agreed not to attack Iraq in exchange for weapons development.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/985906/posts

3. 9/11 Commission reaffirms Bush administration view of Iraq/AQ ties.
June 21, 2004. RNC.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1157478/posts

4. Long List of Clinton Administration Officials who Believed There was an AQ/Iraq connection.
July 12, 2004. NewsMax.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1169397/posts

5. List of CIA and various Reports regarding Iraq's support for terrorists, terrorism and AQ.
September 16, 2004. The Weekly Standard.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/631slkle.asp

6. Osama bin Laden was considered an Iraqi Intelligence asset.
October 14, 2004. National Review.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1246505/posts

Funny how in the 90's the world was concerned about the growing relationship between OBL and Saddam and now the left is revising history.

Saddam reaching out to OBL
January 1, 1999. Newsweek
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1158277/posts

ABC news reports on the Osama/Saddam connections
January 14, 1999. ABC News
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1229608/posts?page=1

Osama and Saddam Work Together
January 27, 1999. Laurie Mylroie interview. She is a former Clinton terrorism czar.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1158482/posts

A Much Shunned Terrorist Takes Refuge In Iraq (Abu Nidal)
New York Times. January 1999.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1433610/posts

Western Nightmare: Saddam and OBL versus the World. Iraq recruited OBL.
February 6, 1999. The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,12469,798270,00.html

Saddam's Link to OBL
February 6, 1999. The Guardian
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/866105/posts

Saddam offered asylum to bin Laden
February 13, 1999. AP
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1158274/posts

Son of Saddam coordinates with OBL.
Iraqi Special Ops coordinates with Bin Laden's terrorist activities.
August 6, 1999. Yossef Bodansky, National Press Club
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/951911/posts

That and more here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1327993/posts?q=1&&page=151


3 posted on 11/01/2005 3:08:50 PM PST by Peach (The Dems enabled Able Danger. 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mark in iowa

happy to bump.


4 posted on 11/01/2005 3:10:45 PM PST by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
The libs have slid so far to the left, they are immersed in a flood of hypocrisy. Now just pure troublemakers and liars, they serve no useful purpose to America. They are major detractors, obstructionists, and criminals.

What an excellent way of wording the truth about liberals. Bravo!

5 posted on 11/01/2005 3:10:47 PM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mark in iowa

Good post BUMP!


6 posted on 11/01/2005 3:11:13 PM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark in iowa

Well .. there's a whole boatload of documents with statements from the liberals about Iraq. Those made when Clinton was President, and those made when Bush is President is just stunning in their complete 180 degree change.


7 posted on 11/01/2005 3:11:42 PM PST by CyberAnt (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I presume most of those statements are on video.

I'd love to get them run together on a loop, get several big plasma TV's (or whatever) on the side of truck with huge speakers and play it on the street next to peace-nick rallies.

They are unaware, no doubt.

As an aside, I think all serious analysts STILL believe there were WMD, but they cannot be found. WHICH IS THE POINT of WMD, after all.

Enough to kill everyone in manhattan can be hidden in a room the size of Saddam's spyder hole.

And it doesn't have to come out to eat Clarke bars.


8 posted on 11/01/2005 3:12:14 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mark in iowa

Highly bumpable.


9 posted on 11/01/2005 3:14:20 PM PST by MamaLucci (Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

BTTT


10 posted on 11/01/2005 3:22:18 PM PST by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mark in iowa
If the democRATS insist on meeting in the U.S. Senate behind closed doors, we will need to INSIST that every person who spoke the above quotes, testify before Congress to explain their statements.

We must also insist that these same people tell us what they know, and when they knew it.

We must also insist that they foreclose documents to back up their claims.

If they fail to do the aforementioned, they need to shut up, and get off President Bush's back!!!

We won. YOU lost. Shut the hell up and open the doors of the U.S. Senate!! NOW!!
11 posted on 11/01/2005 3:32:29 PM PST by GeorgeW23225 ("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark in iowa

BTTT


12 posted on 11/01/2005 3:38:02 PM PST by Jackknife ( "I bet after seeing us, George Washington would sue us for calling him 'father'." —Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark in iowa
If the democRATS insist on meeting in the U.S. Senate behind closed doors, we will need to INSIST that every person who spoke the above quotes, testify before Congress to explain their statements.

We must also insist that these same people tell us what they know, and when they knew it.

We must also insist that they foreclose documents to back up their claims.

If they fail to do the aforementioned, they need to shut up, and get off President Bush's back!!!

We won. YOU lost. Shut the hell up and open the doors of the U.S. Senate!! NOW!!
13 posted on 11/01/2005 3:51:39 PM PST by GeorgeW23225 ("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark in iowa

Great post


14 posted on 11/01/2005 3:52:18 PM PST by Rosemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark in iowa
A great list of witnesses for the Senate Intelligence Committee.

"Did you mislead the American people about WMD programs in Iraq?"

15 posted on 11/01/2005 3:59:15 PM PST by TigersEye (When I think of you, undistracted by creations of sin and virtue, I choose to stay in love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Exactly!!

Bring each and every one of those people before the Senate Intelligence Committee and make them explain to the American people WHY they made those statements!!


16 posted on 11/01/2005 4:11:59 PM PST by GeorgeW23225 ("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mark in iowa

bumpmark


17 posted on 11/01/2005 4:20:41 PM PST by Squeako (ACLU: "Only Christians, Boy Scouts and War Memorials are too vile to defend.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson