[Cboldt]

For lying about what he said to Russert

More generically, for lying to investigators and the GJ. The indictment puts those lies into several contexts, one of which is Russert.

But the alleged general lie is that Libby asserted to investigators that he had no indpenedent knowledge of Plame, when the evidence is that he did have independent knowledge, e.g., via having inquired of the CIA.

[Mo1]

Yes ... your post is a more detailed answer

Thanks