Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diplomat

Eyah Say there.

Harumph - that's not very diplomatic of you, Sir.


29 posted on 11/01/2005 10:12:25 AM PST by furball4paws (One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: furball4paws
The glee which the evolutionists attack this issue masks the truth about where they stand on the larger and more important issues of our country. They say "this man lied, therefore, ID is really creationism and cannot be allowed into the marketplace of ideas because it is so obviously wrong. Only the stupid cannot see this. And look, the ID supporters have to lie about their Christianity. They cannot be trusted"

Why is it that this man lied about whether he said creationism or ID at some school board meeting? Is it because of all the tolerance and openess thay have shown to those who challenge evolution? Is it because the U.S. Constitution states that they cannot allow their religion to influence their public policy decisions?

I say, it's absolutely irrelevant whether their motivation is religious or not; the elected school board members of that community has the right to decide their education curriculum, not Washington DC and the public university elitists. Bringing this into the court and using the leftist court system to ram evolution down the throat of all those who oppose it is the real abomination here.

The evolutions behave like the democrats and accept the MSM article about evolution as fair reporting. Reporters don't lie when it comes to science, they only lie about Republican politicians. The obvious bias of the MSM is lost upon them when the context of the article is evolution.

No one will respond to my Constitutional question because they know I am right. The marketplace of ideas is not acceptable to the evolutionists, no one can question evolution. No one can teach an alternative without all their students education becoming automatically unaccredidated.

Thus one can conclude that the evolutionists are perfectly comfortable with the current court interpretation of absolute seperation of church and state because it advances their ideology. This perversion of the Constitution is irrelevant to them because their position is being supported by it. I do not believe they fully understand the long term consequences of taking this position, which is at odds with their party.

I hear crickets chirping all right.

223 posted on 11/01/2005 2:53:10 PM PST by Diplomat (Give me a real Conservative on the Supreme Court, or give me Republican party death!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson