Eyah Say there.
Harumph - that's not very diplomatic of you, Sir.
Why is it that this man lied about whether he said creationism or ID at some school board meeting? Is it because of all the tolerance and openess thay have shown to those who challenge evolution? Is it because the U.S. Constitution states that they cannot allow their religion to influence their public policy decisions?
I say, it's absolutely irrelevant whether their motivation is religious or not; the elected school board members of that community has the right to decide their education curriculum, not Washington DC and the public university elitists. Bringing this into the court and using the leftist court system to ram evolution down the throat of all those who oppose it is the real abomination here.
The evolutions behave like the democrats and accept the MSM article about evolution as fair reporting. Reporters don't lie when it comes to science, they only lie about Republican politicians. The obvious bias of the MSM is lost upon them when the context of the article is evolution.
No one will respond to my Constitutional question because they know I am right. The marketplace of ideas is not acceptable to the evolutionists, no one can question evolution. No one can teach an alternative without all their students education becoming automatically unaccredidated.
Thus one can conclude that the evolutionists are perfectly comfortable with the current court interpretation of absolute seperation of church and state because it advances their ideology. This perversion of the Constitution is irrelevant to them because their position is being supported by it. I do not believe they fully understand the long term consequences of taking this position, which is at odds with their party.
I hear crickets chirping all right.