Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is SCOTUS nominee Samuel Alito Pro Abortion?
Find Law ^ | 10.31.05

Posted on 10/31/2005 7:58:05 PM PST by Coleus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-337 last
To: TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
I get the impression some demand perfection >>

I don't want perfection, I want a candidate who as a judge decided for life, Alito had 2 chances and did NOT, this concerns me.

Alito decided No

Priscilla Owens or Janice Rogers Brown decided YES

I would have been more at ease with either of these two ladies rather than Sam.
321 posted on 11/02/2005 8:09:13 AM PST by Coleus (I support ethical, effective and safe stem cell research and use: adult, umbilical cord, bone marrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Kryptonite
Look, you're a liar. I can live with that.

There were no insults on the thread until you showed up. Good discussion, no brown boots, no smearing.

Take a hike.

322 posted on 11/02/2005 2:49:52 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

Is SCOTUS nominee Samuel Alito Pro Abortion?
 
In 3 of 4 cases, Supreme Court nominee Alito voted on the side of abortion rights
 
MAMMA MIA, THAT'S MY BOY! (DNC intimates Alito is Mafia and soft on crime, How low will they go?)

323 posted on 11/02/2005 6:18:51 PM PST by Coleus (I support ethical, effective and safe stem cell research and use: adult, umbilical cord, bone marrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Well I wasn't talking about him but you oh smart one.


324 posted on 11/02/2005 6:23:14 PM PST by fatima ("My son is under a doctor's care and should not take P.E. today. Please execute him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Thanks Petronski.


325 posted on 11/02/2005 6:30:18 PM PST by fatima ("My son is under a doctor's care and should not take P.E. today. Please execute him.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

You're an immature child, living in your own make believe world.

Sing yourself another lullaby, chump.


326 posted on 11/02/2005 6:36:09 PM PST by Kryptonite (McCain, Graham, Warner, Snowe, Collins, DeWine, Chafee - put them in your sights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: Kryptonite; jwalsh07
In 3 of 4 cases, Supreme Court nominee Alito voted on the side of abortion rights

327 posted on 11/02/2005 7:16:04 PM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Nominee's Reasoning Points to a Likely Vote Against Roe v. Wade
328 posted on 11/02/2005 7:29:23 PM PST by Kryptonite (McCain, Graham, Warner, Snowe, Collins, DeWine, Chafee - put them in your sights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Kryptonite
I hope so, time will tell.

From what I recall Anthony Kennedy was a Conservative, pro-life Catholic too. Read more about it here.

Religion and the Court: Harriet Miers's faith tells us nothing about how she would rule

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110007409

http://www.godspy.com/issues/Will-Catholics-be-Fooled-Again-by-Paul-A-Green.cfm
329 posted on 11/02/2005 7:36:59 PM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I think he will, not because he's pro-life but because he understands the abomination of constitutional jurisprudence the holding of Roe and the reasoning behind Griswold represent. I'll have a better feel for him upon seeing him testify during a hearing. But I don't see anything alarming about him on the issue of Roe so far.

Kennedy must have felt pretty guilty about his own role in abortion in this country to be reduced to salvaging it on the basis of stare decisis, and he actually used the political anarchy and representative cultural angst that has followed Roe as a reason for upholding it. I can't see Alito following Kennedy on this issue at all.

And Miers' male friend, Justice Hecht, said in one of the first articles following her nomination that one can be pro-life as much as the day is long and still uphold Roe. I haven't seen anybody close to Alito make that sort of comment when speaking about him.

All of this is reading tea leaves to an extent. Let's see what Alito says during the hearing.


330 posted on 11/02/2005 8:03:36 PM PST by Kryptonite (McCain, Graham, Warner, Snowe, Collins, DeWine, Chafee - put them in your sights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

"I read Scalia opinion eviscerating Alito's opinion.

No need to go further than the SCOTUS "

So I'm taking it you didn't bother reading alito's original opinion?

Because if you bothered to read that, I don't see how you can call his decision political activism.

Both alito and scalia had to resort to interpreting the original intent of congress to clarify whether or not the SSA rules were in line with them. The supremes actually resorted to a much broader interpretation of them, while alito settled on a more narrow one. In essence, the supremes seemed to reason that test if they could work at a job they used to hold, that translated as a general test that there would be another job somewhere in the economy with similar physical requirements - so it didn't matter that the older job was no longer around. Alito took it as saying because a literal following of the 5 step SSA rules could leave an applicant unable to find work, because it didn't take into account the fact that some jobs may be extinct, which would leave the applicant without work and without SS benefits. And that would be against the original intent of the legislation.

And he wasn't being an 'activist' because he cited numerous cases and precedents to back up his interpetation.

So, again, I don't see how you can call his decision / opinion 'activism' unless you didn't bother to read it, and only looked at the opinion of the supreme court or maybe saw somebody else call it 'activism' and you thought it would be a good idea to call it the same thing.


331 posted on 11/02/2005 8:08:04 PM PST by flashbunny (Anybody want to trade Alito back in for Miers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

But words for the slaughter of innocence?


332 posted on 11/02/2005 11:43:54 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

Samuel Alito's Votes on Other Abortion Cases Prompt Questions
333 posted on 11/03/2005 1:27:05 PM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Marking.


334 posted on 11/05/2005 10:56:08 AM PST by TAdams8591 (It's the Supreme Court, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I come belatedly to this thread.

"Fiscal conservatives who eschew the social politics not so pro life as us."

I really don't consider people who are only fiscally conservative, like Christy Todd Whitman, to be conservative. Never have. Never will.

335 posted on 11/05/2005 11:50:28 AM PST by TAdams8591 (It's the Supreme Court, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

You just can't help defending partial birth abortion can you, you sick and twisted freak?


336 posted on 01/21/2006 7:39:07 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

So you must oppose Alito's confirmation then. After all, he's such a "sick and twisted freak" that he struck down a Partial Birth Abortion law. We can't be having him on the SC. I'm just an average joe, he actually had a say in it. That must make Bush and the entire GOP caucus in the Senate "sick and twisted freaks" as well. They all support someone who's struck down a partial birth abortion law.

Will you actively campaign to have Bush impeached and against all the GOP senators who will vote to confirm this "sick and twisted freak" that defended partial birth abortion to the SCOTUS?


337 posted on 01/21/2006 10:46:49 PM PST by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-337 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson