They're party is insignificant next to the power of the Force. (NFL Films Voice) "In the frozen tundra of Lambeau Field, Quarterback President Bush scrambled to his right, and with a block from SCOTUS nominee Alito, drove into the end zone through the liberal Dallas Cowboy defense...."
They're party is insignificant next to the power of the Force.Then defeat it is!
This is Braveheart!
I aam going to pik a faaaight!!!! (My Scottish is rusty.)
You want it, you got it!
Alito used to put gangsters in jail. He will do fine agaianst the whacko left. So Teddy, beware, he may come after you, you puffed up, overly fat, no good for nothing so and so!
How can they spout this trash with a straight face?
Sounds good to me. Can you Dems say, "Fallujah?"
Interesting hypocritical take there... lol
It's time to defeat the Left once and for all--and to drop all those sociopaths and morons into the oubliette of history where they belong.
I would like Neas to explain how a Constitutional Originalist is a threat to Constitutional rights.
A thought I wanted to share of perhaps a slightly different way to view the effects of the Alito nomination and the confirmation battle that now looms.
An old business consultant acquaintance of mine used to always say something to the effect that..."Often, the most effective way to solve a particular vexing problem, is to somehow force those tasked with solutions to it to first begin, before even attempting to envision or discuss various potential solutions, by defining and differentiating the elements (causes) of a problem into logical constituent parts."
I found if followed this approach often produces a sort of magic when it comes to solving problems...even though it is much easier said than done as everyone wants to talk about the solution first, which is where efforts first gravitate unless forced to not go there. To not first talk about solutions is sort of like having to learn to ride a bicycle backwards. It can be done but it does not occur naturally.
Anyway, her catch phrase for this approach was to "First differentiate before you attempt to re-integrate." The re-integrate step was of course evaluating and deciding on different possible solutions, once you had all the causes (elemental parts to solutions) on the table and logically organized.
In my opinion the confirmation fight that will now ensue from the Alito nomination should serve to cause this very same (and effective) differentiation step to occur first, in the overall effort to solve the vexing problem of activist judges.
The more it is a rip roaring confirmation fight dominated by arguments over the role of our constitution and the constitutionally limited and defined role of the judiciary, the more effective it will cause everyone and every group to publically show their colors and in effect differentiate themselves into their logical constituent (political) elements for the general electorate to view as they begin to ponder the way they may want to vote come next November, i.e., a significant step in any solution.
Seems to me the more we in our own individual ways keep our confirmation rhetoric focused on the central point of the proper constitutional role of judges, and cast all specific issue concerns so as to underscore that central constitutional argument, I think we win hands down. Not only with respect to this nomination but the election next November as well.
Once this battle gets rolling and the left shows their true colors, alot of their supporters will question their own reality.