Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SouthernBoyupNorth; moog
I think that teaching to the lowest common denominator is a problem.... it does hold back those who could do more and gives them no incentive to over achieve.... when did over achieving become a "bad thing"?

A comment made to me about this which has frosted my husband to no end it that the bighter ones become an incentive to the underachievers, they can help them. My husband's attitude to that is "Fine, where's her paycheck if she is expected to teach the others"

23 posted on 10/31/2005 9:40:18 AM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz
A comment made to me about this which has frosted my husband to no end it that the bighter ones become an incentive to the underachievers, they can help them. My husband's attitude to that is "Fine, where's her paycheck if she is expected to teach the others"

I don't know the context of the comment so I may be off base right here, but tje brighter ones can become an incentive in my own class. BUT the way I use it menas being an INSPIRATION, not as a tutor. Last year I had a girl who went up 3 grade levels in one month in reading. You can bet I made a big deal out of it. Pretty soon a bunch of other students wanted to be just like her. They went home and made sure they read each night and soon started to improve rapidly. Not many got up where the girl was, but many made very good individual progress (2nd grade or above--I teach first grade). Only one person didn't get a second grade level, but she was very close and had made amazing progress too. I love having above-average reading students. It sure doesn't hurt.

71 posted on 10/31/2005 2:59:16 PM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson