Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revealed: Blair's nuclear bombshell (Trident Missiles)
Independent Via IRNA ^

Posted on 10/31/2005 7:47:12 AM PST by F14 Pilot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Canard
I'm not sure how you get from my suggestion that the funds could be better spent ensuring that our soldiers who are actually in harms way have the very best support and equipment to disbanding the army...

Depriving Britain of her "Big Stick" ensures that her soldiers are the equivalent of every non-nuclear army in the world. The best backpacks, knives and conventional weapons in the world mean diddly-squat when an entire army is removed from existence by a nuclear weapon. At that point, retaliation in kind is required.....and you apparently approve of removing that option from the table.

21 posted on 10/31/2005 11:38:09 AM PST by Decepticon (The sheep pretend the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog lives for that day (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
The obvious implicit alternative is to shelter under Uncle Sam's nuclear umbrella, along with the Canadians, Germans, Scandinavians, etc.
22 posted on 10/31/2005 11:44:44 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (NY Times headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS, Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Decepticon

That's right. I was looking at history and possible futures at the same time. England certainly has a history of gov't that enabled international commerce, and America was founded on international commerce and the English model. China and India are trying hard to build international commerce for themselves rather than waiting for it to come to them. Pakistan was on the list because they must develop international commerce from a position of relative isolation or eventually fade from the world scene. Russia is on the list because with such immense resources they could come back from invisibility at any time.


23 posted on 10/31/2005 11:45:03 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Decepticon

Your rationale for spending £20 billion on a nuclear detterent is that, when it fails to deter some unspecified other power from obliterating us for some reason, whoever is left in a deep bunker under the smouldering ruins can obliterate them back?

We seem to agree that we cannot identify or presently conceive anyone that it is actually deterring anyway.


24 posted on 10/31/2005 12:05:12 PM PST by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Canard
We seem to agree that we cannot identify or presently conceive anyone that it is actually deterring anyway.

Contraire my FRiend. If the 3rd US ID was tactically nuked rolling into Baghdad, every despot, dictator and mullah in the mideast understands that they would ALSO be on the receiving end of a tactical nuclear warhead. And ours (the West) are much more accurate.....for now. Deterrence works, and keeps those that can't hide relatively honest. You seem to miss the point....Iran, China, India, Pakistan, N. Korea all want or have recently acquired nukes, the Big Stick. Why? And why should the Brits give them up, when so many other nations will do anything to acquire them........hmmmmmmm

25 posted on 10/31/2005 12:24:40 PM PST by Decepticon (The sheep pretend the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog lives for that day (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13
OK, but will they actually fight this time, or will we have to bail out your sorry butts again?
26 posted on 10/31/2005 12:27:08 PM PST by null and void (The only thing that wakes you up faster than coffee is spilled coffee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Fight whom?


27 posted on 10/31/2005 12:46:30 PM PST by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
To our British friends: welcome to official third world status.

?????

The Brits seem to be going ahead with the plan. Just because lefties are squawking doesn't mean it's been scrapped.

28 posted on 10/31/2005 12:48:50 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Canard
FRiend, I hope I don't come across as some nuke loving warmonger. The US and USSR have played this game before, rational minds and terse diplomacy kept the stalemate in check. I truly believe that scientists on both side realized they were playing with fire beyond their control. Unfortunately, I have much less faith in the islam mindset.....perhaps they should read up on Mike, the 4th largest H bomb ever detonated....a mere 10.8 megatons.

The mushroom cloud climbed to 57,000 feet in only 90 seconds, entering the stratosphere. One minute later it reached 108,000 feet, eventually stabilizing at a ceiling of 120,000 feet. Half an hour after the test the mushroom stretched 60 miles across, with the base of the mushroom head joining the stem at 45,000 feet.

29 posted on 10/31/2005 12:49:09 PM PST by Decepticon (The sheep pretend the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog lives for that day (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Yeah, I know, I overstated the case. I was trying to make the point by exagerating the circumstances, but you're right. Gotta watch that hyperbole now and then.

However, their food still.... no, won't go there ;^>


30 posted on 10/31/2005 12:54:37 PM PST by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
wow. for a PM from the Labour Party, Blair certainly isn't annoying very often.
31 posted on 10/31/2005 12:56:18 PM PST by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
However, their food still.... no, won't go there ;^>

Oh, go ahead. Say it. A cuisine that deserves warm beer :-)

32 posted on 10/31/2005 1:53:46 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

Blair needs to switch parties.


33 posted on 10/31/2005 2:18:44 PM PST by rightinthemiddle (I know my enemy. I have Cable TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13

I think you just made my point...


34 posted on 10/31/2005 2:55:20 PM PST by null and void (The only thing that wakes you up faster than coffee is spilled coffee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"Who knows about quaternion output star trackers? England, America, China, India, Russia, Pakistan. Nobody else."

True...but ultra-long-range guidance can be otherwise accomplished, too.

35 posted on 10/31/2005 3:02:58 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

"Blair needs to switch parties"

You ever hear any of his actual policies?


36 posted on 10/31/2005 3:08:52 PM PST by Canard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Canard

Yes, he is a liberal...but the WOT is the most important issue.


37 posted on 11/01/2005 5:50:04 AM PST by rightinthemiddle (I know my enemy. I have Cable TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson