How would you explain their exceedingly high incidence of violent crime, especially against members outside their race?
This is factually incorrect, as the vast majority of black crime is black on black crime, as I posted here:
Actually most black crime is black-on-black crime.
You responded that blacks commit more crimes against whites than whites do against blacks. I took this as an argument. I probably should not have done so, as it is an irrelevancy and does not support your original statement at all.
The fact is that blacks are both the perpetrators and the victims of the vast majority of violent crimes in the US. Since they commit crimes at a ratio of over 6:1 to whites, it makes sense that white VICTIMS of crimes would suffer more at the hands of blacks than blacks do at the hands of whites. Again, this is a statistical irrelevancy to your original statement.
I am glad you liked my moniker. How did you like the tagline that went with it?
I wrote too quickly in stating the statistical evidence for crimes outside their race. I was only pointing out the fact that when you normalize the data the violent crime rate against whites is much higher than that of whites against blacks, substantially so and I dont believe that it can be justified by crime rate alone.
Im glad you didnt go nuclear on me, thanks for bringing it back to a somewhat rational discussion.