Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioWfan
I post to this to nip in the bud any negative commentray sent Alito's way vis a vis Partial Birth Abortion. In Planned Parenthood of Central New Jersey v Farmer Alito concurred with the finding of the court that because Stenberg v Carhart was precedential he had no choice to but to declare New Jersey's ban on the murder of later term unborn babies unconstitutional.

Now, I put it like that not to cast aspersions on Judge Alito but to cast aspersions on a SCOTUS that reads that killing into the constitution.

We can not expect appellate judges to become activist and then call for non activist courts. I actually feel sorry for the man, being put in a position where he has to affirm the some nefarious constitutional right of women to tear their near full term babies limb from limb.

1,640 posted on 10/31/2005 11:03:02 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1628 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
Look, it's up to real RTL judges to figure out every which way that is possible that a decision regarding killing babies ploughs new ground and is not subject to stare decisis.

Otherwise, that judge dips his spear in the blood of the innocent.

It's one of the reasons we really should not be nominating any current judges who have ever had a RTL case to the USSC.

1,800 posted on 10/31/2005 6:18:11 PM PST by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1640 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson