Why do you say that? My initial impression was more positive. For example, they took the position that there was excellent reasons for going to war with Iraq, over both terrorist ties and WMD, and they explained not finding the nuclear WMD's in Iraq with their details about it being in Libya. It seemed like hard nosed stuff supporting Bush's War on Terror even better than Bush himself can state, in his carefully filtered sound bytes.
From the link in # 10 ( Who Was Behind The Forged Niger Uranium Documents? Oct 31, 2005 By Philip Giraldi, The American Conservative.), which sounds innocent enough, go to Front Page and scroll down to the links column on the left, appropriately. There you will find.
American Freedom News
Anti-War
Amnesty International
Arab World News
BBC
Bush Watch
CBC
Human Rights Watch
LA Times
PBS
The Independent
The Nation
The Rumor Mill
The Telegraph
I went to all the links, two brought up blank pages, and one or two may be extreme right but all are anti-America and/or anti-Bush.
I am only warning that the source should be considered when evaluating the articles.