To: smoothsailing
Will be interested to hear wilson and Plame's testimonies under oath at any trial of Libby, especially the cross examination. It's going to make them look very bad and may even set themselves up for perjury.
To: connectthedots
This whole Niger Uranium affairs stinks. Niger is one of the top uranium mining countries of the world. Does the CIA expect us to believe they have no operatives in that country who can tell us where their uranium exports are going? That the British and Israeli intelligence agencies can't tell us what's going on?
They want us to believe there is so little information about uranium exports from Niger, that the CIA sends the HUSBAND of one of their cubicle dwelling analysts to find out whats going on? Someone with no expertise in this area? Someone who does not even sign a confidentiality agreement? In my non-defense line of work you don't get a contract to CLEAN TOILETS without signing a confidentiality/nondisclosure agreement. What the hell is going on at the CIA?
What if this amateur tipped off the wrong people while stumbling around overseas? What if he published an article about this covert work in the NY Times (whoops, he already did that).
Who hired this loose cannon? How much did Wilson get paid? What damage did he do to our wartime anti-terror operations by revealing his mission? These are the important questions that no one in the MSM is asking.
To: connectthedots
CONNECTTHEDOTS WROTE: "Will be interested to hear wilson and Plame's testimonies under oath at any trial of Libby, especially the cross examination. It's going to make them look very bad and may even set themselves up for perjury."
EXACTLY what I was thinking.
62 posted on
10/31/2005 3:34:31 AM PST by
Concerned
(My Motto: It's NEVER wrong to do what's RIGHT!!!)
To: connectthedots
It would be interesting...but will never make it to the ms news.
140 posted on
10/31/2005 11:37:40 AM PST by
NonLinear
(He's dead, Jim)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson