Matthew 25:41-46:
Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:
For I was ahungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink:
I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not.
Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?
Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.:
And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.
Yea, when Augie and the bud guys stand before God and all the misery is shown ,their product played a role in, and they profited off of, it will not be helpful to them!
They got water just not that kind.
Oh, please. They have handed out countless bottles of water in their relief effort. No one went without water because the SBC didn't hand out the Bud water.
Have many bottles of water have you handed out to hurricane victims?
If you are going to pretend to preach the Bible, at least get the context right. You are pretending that the Baptists didn't know that there was other water available. You are also pretending that the Baptist did not know there were others available who could pass out the water.
That scripture can be twisted anyway you want for the immediate political point you are trying to make.
You could even make that verse say that if a man was thirsty and only one of his two friends gave him water one day, because one friend was all it took to do the job, the other man was disobeying that verse. You would then be guilty of a false accusation.
The people were not denied water.
BTW, by ignoring the contextual details of that verse you end up with any meaning you want. In fact, your open rendering of that verse would mean that any living person on this planet that day who did not give those thirsty people water that day are in violation of that verse.
Your exposition is nonsense and you ignored the context in order to make a cheap political point.