Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brian Mosely
Big deal - I would expect Cheney to be called as a witness. Maybe it's the open court that's the big deal. As far as I can tell, Cheney probably told the investigator about his talk with his Chief of Staff.

This might be a ploy by the prosecutor to begin the plea deal since his star witness would be Cooper or Russert.

Or it might just be more Drudge/MSM nonsense that characterized this case:

22 indictments
board conspiracy
wide misconduct by VP's office
Bolton indicted
Hadley indicted

and on and on...
15 posted on 10/30/2005 3:52:58 PM PST by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Patriot from Philly
Big deal - I would expect Cheney to be called as a witness. Maybe it's the open court that's the big deal. As far as I can tell, Cheney probably told the investigator about his talk with his Chief of Staff. This might be a ploy by the prosecutor to begin the plea deal since his star witness would be Cooper or Russert. Or it might just be more Drudge/MSM nonsense that characterized this case: 22 indictments board conspiracy wide misconduct y VP's office Bolton indicted Hadley indicted and on and on...

Exactly,Cheney should go and tell the truth. Libby should push for a trial next week, the sooner the absolute nonsense of this attack is revealed in court the better.

I have a question. During the Clinton scandals didn't the SCOUS decide that Clinton wasn't protected from a requirement to testify? That's what ultimately got him impeached, isn't it? If I'm right about the Supreme Court's decision under Clinton, how would Cheney be able to assert executive privilege anyway.

74 posted on 10/30/2005 4:58:06 PM PST by Americalover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson