Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: who_would_fardels_bear

BTW quotes are in parentheses.


30 posted on 10/30/2005 2:40:25 PM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Varda
This is what Luttig said with regard to stare decisis:

"I understand the Supreme Court to have intended its decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), to be a decision of super-stare decisis with respect to a woman's fundamental right to choose whether or not to proceed with a pregnancy."

This is not his understanding (as implied in the original article) but the Supreme Court's decision which he believes he has no chance of changing by agreeing with the defendants.

31 posted on 10/30/2005 2:51:09 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson