Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Varda
I disagree. I read his decision carefully and he clearly disassociates himself from the court's decision.

Ultimately he believes that as an appelate justice he must be guided by Supreme Court decisions which he believes he has no chance of overturning.

The only result would be a delay in the inevitable conclusion.

However, as a Supreme Court justice he would be able at that point to overturn Roe as bad law.

27 posted on 10/30/2005 2:27:52 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: who_would_fardels_bear
He called abortion a fundamental right. I'm assuming he means what he says.
29 posted on 10/30/2005 2:37:07 PM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson