"No one asked the SBC to distribute anything unwholesome. "
Wow, you called condoms "unwholesome"! But still, I don't see where the analogy fails. Pardon the caps but THEY DON'T HAVE TO DISTRIBUTE ANYTHING THEY DON'T WANT TO. Did you know that the Red Cross will not accept clothing? I didn't either until I volunteered at a relief site for Katrina. Let's go write some articles about that.
AP:
RED CROSS REFUSES CLOTHING FOR KATRINA SURVIVORS
Dateline: Houston
Thousands of people were turned away by the Red Cross today, they brought clothing for waterlogged New Orleaneans but the Red Cross turned it all down. They only want cash and canned goods."
OK, the story is mine but I lived through it.
Here's a link: http://www.redcross.org/news/in/tsunamis/faq.html#where
It doesn't specifically mention Katrina but the result is the same, no clothing donations.
My quote: "No, I don't see where it fails."
Your quote: "Of course you do. You equated condoms with water. No one asked the SBC to distribute anything unwholesome. That's the difference." If you can't be intellectually honest about this, at least be amusing."
Please show me where I equated condoms with water. Does advertising send a message, yes or no? Is the SBC allowed to determine what message they send, yes or no?
"If you can't be intellectually honest about this, at least be amusing." You can always tell when someone is losing a discussion, they start throwing insults instead of opinion or fact.