[weegee]

Time Magazine is that hackwork that asked if Rush Limbaugh was "good" for America and yet called the Unabomber a mad "genius".

They altered the cover shot of Rush (as USA Today recently did to a photo of Condi) to make him appear more evil.

Who cares what these Rat trash talkers have to say about ANYTHING.

They assert that Karl is "bloodied" by this non-scandal and want to expose the "bigger" issue of why we went to war in Iraq.

How about uncovering who sent Joe Wilson and why?

How about uncovering who forged the National Guard memos in an attempt to steal the 2004 election?

What a worthless journalistic endeavor. It doesn't even make good fishwrap.

[DCPatriot]

Agree totally.

God Bless FreeRepublic and MoveAmericaForward.

[t2buckeye]

The biggest problem with this whole article is TIME's assertion that this case has "revisited" the issue of why we went to war. IT DOESN"T. EVEN Fitz said that. THis is a case of someone allegedly lying to a GJ and FBI about converstations they had with journalists about a "supposedly" covert CIA employee in retaliation for an editorial about the war written by her husband.
(1) SHe wasn't covert so no law was broken
(2) Wilson's editorial has since been discredited NOT by the WHite House but by a by-partisan Senate committee and therefore, Wilson's "contribution" to the argument about the Iraq war is irrelevant.

The "tie-in" to the war with this case is OVER. It's time for Time to be intellectually honest here! I know..that's asking too much

[devolve]

- a little refresher about the liberal's ethics -

 mp3   LIVE  AND  LET  DIE   mid