To: gcruse
contraception changed sexual morality. BS!
There is no "contraception" that doesn't have a failure risk. Taking the chance of bringing an unplanned child in the world, no matter how low the risk, is still immoral no matter what the liberals spew.
9 posted on
10/30/2005 9:40:02 AM PST by
Clint N. Suhks
(If you don't like Jesus, you can go to hell.)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Technology may not change morality, but it very often changes behavior. This is true for the cell phone and the microwave oven and birth control.
11 posted on
10/30/2005 9:44:23 AM PST by
durasell
To: Clint N. Suhks
There is no "contraception" that doesn't have a failure risk. Taking the chance of bringing an unplanned child in the world, no matter how low the risk, is still immoral no matter what the liberals spew.Are you saying that when a risk free contraceptive is introduced you will change your position? Or is that just a red herring?
21 posted on
10/30/2005 10:32:01 AM PST by
laredo44
(Liberty is not the problem)
To: Clint N. Suhks
"There is no "contraception" that doesn't have a failure risk." And let's not forget the fact that many don't bother with it anyway.
26 posted on
10/30/2005 10:50:02 AM PST by
sweetliberty
(Stupidity should make you sterile.)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Taking the chance of bringing an unplanned child in the world, no matter how low the risk, is still immoral no matter what the liberals spew. Life is worse than being "unplanned"? Should living unplanned babies be killed? Just trying to follow the logic.
54 posted on
11/02/2005 5:29:52 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson