"Read up on those documents. They were obviose forgeries with the intent of being discovered as such to weaken the standing against action in Iraq. There"
I'm not trying to be argumentitive but asking a sincere question - if they were obvious forgeries why did President Bush reference them in the State of the Union?
Bush didn't, he used the information from the British White Papers they wrote up on their own.
The CIA couldn't refute them because the information came from the Brittons so they left the 16 words in the State of The Union Address.
The British sources were completely different and they still stand by them today.
{SIGH} Copying and Pasting the exact post you responded to, this time bolded:
"U.S. and U.K. intelligence agencies had extensive amounts of information on Iraq's intention's of purchasing Uranium"
If you are indeed sincere, with the limited amount of cognitive ability you publicly display i recommend you stay out of politics. Seriously.
I apologize. My last comment was a little harsh.