Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightFighter
Actually, the Libby indictment makes it pretty clear that Fitzgerald thinks she WAS COVERT prior to this whole episode.

AFAIK, he has only said her employment with the CIA was classified information, probably because he has the memo with the paragraph that she was a CIA employee marked secret. That doesn't mean she was covert.

28 posted on 10/30/2005 4:38:41 AM PST by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: palmer

I posted this on another thread this morning:

Question for anyone.....

The letter appointing Fitzgerald is dated December 30, 2003

The letter from Comey to Fitzgerald authorizing an expansion is dated Februaury 6, 2004.

A mere 30-some odd days.

For us non-laywers out here , would that indicate :

1. a request for clarification of responsibilities
or
2. Fitzgerald did, in fact, learn quickly Plame was not covert?


46 posted on 10/30/2005 4:52:52 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: palmer
 
Actually, the Libby indictment makes it pretty clear that Fitzgerald thinks she WAS COVERT prior to this whole episode.

I'm paraphrasing here but Fitz said "while it is clear that Libby knew she worked for the CIA there was no evidence that he knew she was covert."

!

 

142 posted on 10/30/2005 9:04:59 AM PST by HawaiianGecko (Facts are neither debatable nor open to "I have a right to this opinion" nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson