Yeah! This is the news I needed to hear.
Today just achieved "great" status. Hope the rumors turn out true.
Way to go Bush! My pick is Luttig.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
All this wild-arsed speculation is mind-numbing. I wish all these pundits and pundit wannabes would all just STFU and wait for a nomination, and then react. Pre-acting to something like this seems like peeing into the wind to me.
2 posted on
10/29/2005 5:24:34 PM PDT by
Keith in Iowa
(Liberals - Stuck on Stupid.)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Just wishful thinking at this point, I bet.
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Choosing between Scalito and Luttig is like choosing your favorite eye. I like both. Can we have Souter step aside so that both could get in, please?
4 posted on
10/29/2005 5:25:49 PM PDT by
voletti
(To go where no man has gone before....)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
My pick is Luttig.Good pick. I would be delighted with either one. Plugs and Chuckie, are you ready for your intellectual superiors.
5 posted on
10/29/2005 5:26:09 PM PDT by
Bahbah
(Tony Schaffer is a hero)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Thought the pick had to be a chick...
6 posted on
10/29/2005 5:26:13 PM PDT by
dakine
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Way to go Bush! My pick is Luttig.Luttig is the best. He's a strict constructionist all the way. Also, Clarence Thomas and John Roberts would be thrilled with Luttig joining them as they are both friends of his.
Then again, Alito would be fine too.
7 posted on
10/29/2005 5:26:15 PM PDT by
NeoCaveman
(Janice Rogers Brown for SCOTUS..... or Alito, Jones, Williams, Sykes, or Luttig)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
This fight is winnable if he can get McCain, Graham, DeWine, and Warner on board. Chaffee, Snowe, Collins and Specter are lost causes.
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
12 posted on
10/29/2005 5:27:10 PM PDT by
woofie
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Wow! Two outstanding choices Too bad he didn't go with one of them the first time but if it's truly one of them all is forgiven.
14 posted on
10/29/2005 5:27:37 PM PDT by
saganite
(The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
I would have bet he was going to appoint another woman.
Even so, both of them are great picks.
15 posted on
10/29/2005 5:27:46 PM PDT by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Either of those two appear to a good choice but it's anyone's guess he will. There are many, many well qualified candidates of all manner of racial, ethnic, religious backgrounds. He
could still pick a woman.
Bob Novak had this say: A footnote: Support among senators for Bush's nomination in place of Miers is concentrated on two conservative women: Federal Circuit Judge Karen Williams of Orangeburg, S.C., and Michigan Supreme Court Justice Maura Corrigan.
18 posted on
10/29/2005 5:28:15 PM PDT by
newzjunkey
(CA: YES on Prop 73-77! Unions outspending Arnold 3:1, HELP: http://www.joinarnold.com)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
OK, who pierced Dubya's tinfoil?
20 posted on
10/29/2005 5:28:53 PM PDT by
drlevy88
To: dubyaismypresident; xsmommy
21 posted on
10/29/2005 5:28:56 PM PDT by
tioga
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
As a half-Italian attorney who practices in NJ, my pick is Alito :)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
With an announcement expected Sunday or Monday... Reh, Heh... Reeeeaaaallllyyy? I had heard it would be quick but that's sooner than I expected.
28 posted on
10/29/2005 5:30:47 PM PDT by
Types_with_Fist
(I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Lets not forget that the administration has floated names as a red herring just to get the Left off balance, like the case with Judge Edith Brown Clement being reported as a done deal just before Roberts was announced.
29 posted on
10/29/2005 5:31:02 PM PDT by
counterpunch
(JRB in '05 = GOP in '06)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
My pick is Luttig.How do you think he'd compare to Alito? One big thing I'm curious about are things like WOT-related matters - presidential powers and surveillance powers and things like that. Does anybody know of any indications one way or the other?
33 posted on
10/29/2005 5:33:18 PM PDT by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Butter the popcorn, there is going to be a brawl and we have ringside seats! Watching them go nuts will be as enjoyable as the moral victory.
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Whoever he picks, I think he ought to walk in with Barney first...just to see how many people he frightens to death before he waves the nominee in.
(One of the Old Guard caisson horses in Roman tack might be fun too, but bringing one of those into the West Wing corridors might be a tight fit.)
36 posted on
10/29/2005 5:34:25 PM PDT by
RichInOC
("Brother Bush, how say you?" "Arf! Arf! Grrrrrrrr..." "O-kaaaay...that's one for reversal...")
To: Halfmanhalfamazing; jwalsh07
Rereading the Rosen
piece, Luttig would be the better pick. Alito ruled that the feds could not regulate the posssession of machine guns, allegedly. That will be all over the Dem ads against him, and fair and damaging comment.
37 posted on
10/29/2005 5:34:26 PM PDT by
Torie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson