Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GSlob
I would not call it "rich", just getting to the [a bit lower, but still coveted] status of "person of independent means".

Dubya's Chronicle clipping makes a big fuss about wages.  Their idea is that it doesn't matter if Americans are the happiest and the wealthiest in the world --all is lost if salaries are down.  They'd prefer to have us living in miserable squalor as long as we have a nice paycheck.  

My personal definition of 'wealth' includes happiness, which IMHO is the real goal.  From what I've seen, riches (like fame, popularity, health and power) seem to come about as the result of happiness --even though a lot of people vainly strive for the results in the belief it will bring about the cause.  The truth is that happiness simply starts with a conscious decision to be happy, and the rest can follow.

30 posted on 10/29/2005 11:02:32 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: expat_panama

So wealth OR happiness ? What kind of pollyana nonsense is that ?


32 posted on 10/29/2005 11:05:26 AM PDT by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson