Posted on 10/29/2005 9:05:21 AM PDT by Dubya
Screw the borrowing part!
We are just spending less, driving less, not buying anything unless we absolutely need it. Gotten to the point where few are getting raises or increased salaries.
Yet some people tell us how the economy is booming.
I say BS. Most everyone I know was making the same or better money 5 freaking years ago.
I'd rather compete with them here. All the Indian guys I know have huge mortgages, and need huge salaries to pay them. Of course, now that they've got a green card, they don't want to see any more H1Bs either....it's quite a joke around the office.
A 4.7% boost in profits is hardly an explosion. Wage growth measures the base line at an income of zero. Profit growth measures the base line at an income equal to expenses. So profit growth tend to be much more dynamic than wage growth; In recessions, workers don't get negative wages!
Further, 2.3% wage growth is NOT the slowest in 25 years... not by a long shot. The author must mean it's the slowest REALTIVE to inflation. But the inflation measure used is a lousy indicator of trends; it's artificially high because of fuel costs: The PRODUCER price index shot up 10% in the past year, the fastest ever. (You think maybe THAT'S where all the money for wages went?) The core inflation rate has barely budged.
Lastly, "wages" do not include benefits.
Next quarter, suppose the price of gas falls below $2 a gallon, as it expected. The PPI goes down several percent. The consumer inflation rate goes negative, also. And the wage index rises 1.9%. Do you think they'll be talking about the skyrocketing wages, RELATIVE TO INFLATION? No, they'll be saying wage growth is down again.
I readily part company with the Rush Limbaugh and even Alan Greenspan types, and frequently denounce business news reporting which treats wage growth as if it is deadly. But this article is garbage.
You hit it right on the head.
Wow, if those 65,000 workers (not all of whom are computer programmers) can make such a dent in our wages, we're in worse shape than I thought.
Middle class conservatives will not wake up until it is too late and find out their big brothers have led them down the primrose path.
Dubya's Chronicle clipping makes a big fuss about wages. Their idea is that it doesn't matter if Americans are the happiest and the wealthiest in the world --all is lost if salaries are down. They'd prefer to have us living in miserable squalor as long as we have a nice paycheck.
My personal definition of 'wealth' includes happiness, which IMHO is the real goal. From what I've seen, riches (like fame, popularity, health and power) seem to come about as the result of happiness --even though a lot of people vainly strive for the results in the belief it will bring about the cause. The truth is that happiness simply starts with a conscious decision to be happy, and the rest can follow.
Has it occured to you that savings come from a paycheck ? And that is why the savings rate is so critically low ?
So wealth OR happiness ? What kind of pollyana nonsense is that ?
It doesn't help that the Federal Reserve will cause a recession every time the market favors the wage earner.
4.7% inflation doesn't that seem high?
That's way too high for core inflation. They may be counting energy costs, which skew the numbers due to their volatility.
Absolutely right! Never ceases to amaze how some people can really get things turned bassackwards.
Add living off the rising home equity and the wages might be below 50%.
|
You got that one right.
A good rule of thumb in remembering which inflation is core and which includes volatiles is to remember that if the President is Republican and core is going down, then it's the total inflation that makes the headline.
The reverse is true --pundits had to switch back and forth for a while in the '90s when they were trying to explain which one was the 'important' one.
|
The bean counters like to say rising home value is only an increase of wealth and it really isn't income (!?). Of course, even without home equity, people's wages are not even 2/3 of total average personal income.
Then again, for people like you and me who live on the Planet Earth, any increase in wealth is income -- so IMHO what you posted was absolutely right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.