Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
This may be LL's salvation: I don't know in a public forum if they want to say what Plame's "classification" was or is, because that would allow the defense counsel to press her for specifics until she would have to say, "That's a matter of national security, and I can't tell you," at which point defense would say, "Your honor, I ask for a dismissal, in that we do not have access to all the prosecution's evidence."

The evidence you seek is not relevant to the charge.

15 posted on 10/29/2005 8:51:21 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
The evidence you seek is not relevant to the charge..

Then why is the allegation about classified status in the indictment? It's to set up the materiality of the perjury, right? The defense is entitled to test that, don't you think?

46 posted on 10/29/2005 10:50:56 AM PDT by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson