Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
Subtitute "her ID was leaked by a person who is under the law" for "Plame was not covert" as being what you refer to as "the threshold element."

Does the mere revelation of her "identity" have any legal meaning?

Is it wrongful for "a person under the law" (by which I assume you mean a person bound to handle certain information within certain restrictions) to reveal the mere identity of person when that identity has no particular legal protection?

If I'm a "person under the law" because I, say, have a security clearance, and I reveal information that in fact is not prohibited to reveal (by anyone), I've still done something illegal?

180 posted on 10/29/2005 9:39:02 AM PDT by wouldntbprudent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]


To: wouldntbprudent
Does the mere revelation of her "identity" have any legal meaning?

I used that phrase as shorthand to indicate a violation of 50 USC 421.

50 USC 421 <- Crime of revealing covert agent

50 USC 426 <- Definitions

181 posted on 10/29/2005 10:08:25 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson