What if that lie was in month 15 and it was known that there was no crime because of the 5 year rule in month 2 wouldn't you question the motives of the prosecutor in keeping up the investigation?
That is why I'm interested in the timeline.
Yes, I would and I do. But given the political climate of "who disclosed Plame's ID to Corn/Novak/Pincus," I don't find probing the "who knew what, and when, and from who" question to be unexpected.
IMO, had Libby told the truth, the GJ would have come back with a no bill, no report, no nothing.