Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Balding_Eagle
In your response to this, please address the moral, if not Constitutional, question of punishing anyone after they have fully served their original sentence.

I explained this in a previous post, but let me reiterate. Its not punishment. Or at least, the real question of whether it is punishment is the crux.

I'm not for adding more punishment, and some restrictions may be seen as punishment (I'm open to discuss that). What I don't object to is tracking individuals and notifying neighbors, even if this decision is made after the commission of the crime. There is no freedom to live without the stigma of your previous crimes following you.

Did the government commit ex post facto violations when it created forms that ask, "Have you ever been convicted of a felony?

32 posted on 10/29/2005 11:41:34 AM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan

I object because I do think it is more punishment. I interrupt it as probabtion after the sentence is complete.

I agree about the stigma part, but that is a social issue, not legal.


42 posted on 10/29/2005 3:19:17 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson