"I notice that you didn't address the little 'fib' you told about all the 'polls' you have seen."
And I notice that you didn't read my post #74. Remember, your post referred to a national referendum (Take a national referendum and lets just see), not some city vote.
"or is it just cognitive dissonence?"
In your case...just cognitave dishonesty.
In my example NOONE knows BUT me...you seem to have disregarded that point. You do so in order to avoid the basic reality.
You sir avoided the most important part of my example to you. This was intentional to show you that you only see what you want to see and that you disregard the rest.
In my example to you, if noone knows, then how can I possibly harm anyone? You miss it alltogether.....you took the bait and ran out the reel....
"And I notice that you didn't read my post #74. Remember, your post referred to a national referendum (Take a national referendum and lets just see), not some city vote."
You made comment about a "poll" and I offered you a bonafide poll IN WRITING by AMERICANS. I will cite a VOTE to you and you disregard it and all the while rely on a 'poll' of 500 or 700 or 900 people. I am all for a national vote....the question is ARE YOU. the Second question to you is WILL you accept the vote?
By your dismissal of Denver ( and prolly all the others) you will refuse to accept it.
Dude, you said ALL THE POLLS you have seen......and meanwhile you discuss on another thread a poll that has results you disagree with.
You sir are shown to be dishonest.