Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nunya bidness
It would seem that given Novak's non-indictment and lack of jail time that whoever leaked to him wasn't considered a lawbreaker by the GJ.

Novak was never legally liable for leaking Plames name. As long as he testified before the grand jury he was in no legal danger.

68 posted on 10/29/2005 12:11:09 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Dave S
Novak was never legally liable for leaking Plames name. As long as he testified before the grand jury he was in no legal danger.

That was my point. Novak rolled over and gave up his source. So the question is: Who is the source? If it's Libby then why didn't Libby get indicted on it? If not, then who told Novak and why hasn't that person been indicted?

Like I said. This doesn't pass the smell test. If Plame was outed why hasn't someone been indicted for it? Unless, it did come from the press and and they are protected. Or finally, she wasn't outed, it wasn't against the law to "out" her, and this whole thing is a fishing expedition.

76 posted on 10/29/2005 12:16:38 AM PDT by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson