[The_Reader_David]

But what ping list would I fit on? There isn't one for folks who believe in common descent; have doubts about the neo-Darwinian synthesis for reasons grounded in philosophy of science, rather than in theology, and only strongly object to its misapplication outside of science; object to ID claiming to be scientific because it relies on a priori probability estimates; and regard literalist Biblical heremeneutics as a shallow exercise undertaken by folks standing outside Holy Tradition.

I'm mostly a critic of the whole debate.

Trust me, when I have an inclination to contribute to these threads I join them.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

There isn't one for folks who believe in common descent; have doubts about the neo-Darwinian synthesis for reasons grounded in philosophy of science, rather than in theology, and only strongly object to its misapplication outside of science; object to ID claiming to be scientific because it relies on a priori probability estimates; and regard literalist Biblical heremeneutics as a shallow exercise undertaken by folks standing outside Holy Tradition.

Oh sure. Start nit-picking right off the bat. ;)

But seriously there really isn't any consensus on how people approach this debate. As much as folks supporting modern evolutionary biology are all over the map, the anti-evolution crowd are even more diverse.

I think you fit in just fine.