Posted on 10/28/2005 2:34:41 PM PDT by MikeA
22 months and millions of US tax-payer dollars later, the Valerie Plame CIA leak case ends with not the roar of a lion and the speculated ten indictments against Bush administration officials for their culture of corruption, not with charges against DNC public enemy #1 Karl Rove, or the pipe-dream resignation of Dick Cheney, but rather with the squeak of a mouse and the sought indictment of one Chief of staff for VP Dick Cheney, Scooter Libby
It appears that he is not being indicted for outing a CIA NOC, the original basis for the entire investigation. But rather for telling the Grand Jury that he originally learned Valerie Plames name from a reporter, when it is alleged that he instead learned it first from the VP himself.
Two White House officials with security clearance discussing secure information is not exactly a unique event, let alone a crime. It also goes without saying that nobody could have leaked anything had someone in the CIA itself not leaked it first. Surely it wasnt Tenet himself. After all, he was a Clinton appointee, not a member of the culture of corruption.
It would have helped if the CIA employee at the center of the investigation had actually been under-cover at the time of the alleged outing. It also would have helped if the investigation had been able to find any credible witnesses instead of working a case entirely dependent upon the word of one Joe Wilson, a man with literally no credibility in the real world at all.
But stay tuned Less than thirty days into the investigation, Prosecutor Fitzgerald requested authority to expand the investigation beyond its initial intent. 22 months later, with one half-baked indictment for an alleged secondary infraction of a crime there is no evidence ever existed, the Prosecutor is once again requesting authority to expand the investigation even further.
In case you havent been paying attention, all roads lead to the relentless pursuit of Bush administration officials who liberals have repeatedly accused of lying us into a war in Iraq. Hence, the second request in the 22 month old investigation to expand the depth and breadth of the investigation once more.
Yet after 22 months, it is pretty clear that if any reasonable evidence existed to support the original purpose of the investigation, it surely would have been uncovered by now. I mean, they took every opportunity up until the eleventh hour here, and this is what they have?
Frankly, any Prosecution team that couldnt uncover the evidence of a real crime by now either aint much of a prosecution team, or they aint working with much of a crime Take your pick!
Bottom line, only those who think Martha Stewart is a hardened criminal who belongs behind bars, (like Fitzgerald and relentless liberal Bush-bashers), will see this as anything less than a complete failure to make a real case.
Well, lets face it. After 22 months and millions of dollars, somebody was going to be charged with something.
Instead of appearing to be the massive culture of corruption democrat fund-raisers made it out to be, (with the help of their friends in the press of course, thank you Chris Mathews), this one has the appearance of an eleventh hour indictment aimed at justifying a 22 month old investigation going nowhere
The liberal so-called mainstream press has spent all day - every day for the last two weeks building this case into a crescendo based on the culture of corruption drummed into the hearts and minds of liberal Bush-hating democrat minions, for what? One indictment for a secondary allegation in a crime that apparently never happened? You must be kidding me
Of course when Clinton crony and Kerry National Security Advisor Sandy Burger was convicted of stealing TOP SECRET documents stuffed in his shorts from the national archives, the so-called main-stream press didnt give it a seconds notice even on the back page.
But just watch how fast they convict, draw and quarter and tar and feather Scooter Libby over the coming days and weeks
Liberals better start pricing flights to Canada again Culture of corruption? Right!
We tried to tell you liberal idiots!!!!
I know, we'll be called hypocrites by the Dems. for thinking this an 11th air reach by Fitgerald to find something to justify his 2 years on the federal payroll. But the difference is, perjury was never the main focus of this investigation but in the Lewinsky matter it was. It wasn't just some last minute charge cooked up by Starr based on a faulty memory to find something to make an impeachment referral on. It was at the heart of Clinton's crimes as president.
That being said if it can be proven what Libby said was both MATERIAL and an INTENTIONAL ACT TO DECEIVE, then he should pay the price. But that's going to be a mighty hard case for Fitzgerald to prove. Memories about obscure figures and what was said in minor conversations 2 years ago fade easily.
Anyway, prosecutors typically do this when they can't indict on the main or original charge. I saw it happen to a friend of mine totally innocent of any wrongdoing. They accused him of "playing with the truth" to cook up a perjury charge when he was cleared of over 60 other charges and they couldn't get him on anything else. This is typical prosecutorial abuse and typical of the prosecutor's mindset of "They're all guilty. Now we just have to find them guilty of something.
In the end, Libby walks. But as Mr. Donovan said in the 80s after he was cleared of his politically-motivated indictment by the out of control Lawrence Walsh "Where do I go to get my reputation back?"
Should have indicted the ham sandwich, it would have made as much sense since obviously there was no underlying crime!
One thing we DO know is that Fitzgerald is a DEMOCRAT!! I don't like Libby, but Fitz was out of control at the presser!
Ummm .... I think you're forgetting about Whitewater. Let's not get too conveniently revisionist.
How do we know Fitz is a Dem? Is that a fact, or an assumption? I thought I heard him say today he is not registered in either party.
One of the few sentences he said that I actually understood.
And the hard core democrats and zombies that follow them are recharged and this indictment will strengthen the democrat base. That's why they do it and they do it to punish conservatives who oppose their liberal agenda and to send a message to other who might try to do the same.
This is not over until they reach the VP and Rove. Bookmark this.
My exact thought, you just got there quicker.
"I don't like Libby"
Why?
Since leaking classfied gummint information is a crime, every gummint employee that tells anything in that category to the press, should be prosecuted. One way to clean out the state department {as well as the entire government}.
"It's disappointing that once again, so many Democrat leaders are taking their political cues from the far-left, Moveon wing of the party. The bottom line is Karl Rove was discouraging a reporter from writing a false story based on a false premise and the Democrats are engaging in blatant partisan political attacks."
-RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman
Coopers Own Email Claims Rove Warned Of Potential Inaccuracies In Wilson Information:
[Time Reporter Matt] Cooper Wrote That Rove Offered Him A Big Warning Not To Get Too Far Out On Wilson. Rove Told Cooper That Wilsons Trip Had Not Been Authorized By DCIA - CIA Director George Tenet - Or Vice President Dick Cheney. (Michael Isikoff, "Matt Coopers Source," Newsweek, 7/18/05)
Wilson Falsely Claimed That It Was Vice President Cheney Who Sent Him To Niger, But The Vice President Has Said He Never Met Him And Didnt Know Who Sent Him:
Wilson Says He Traveled To Niger At CIA Request To Help Provide Response To Vice Presidents Office. In February 2002, I was informed by officials at the Central Intelligence Agency that Vice President Dick Cheneys office had questions about a particular intelligence report. The agency officials asked if I would travel to Niger to check out the story so they could provide a response to the vice presidents office. (Joseph C. Wilson, Op-Ed, What I Didnt Find In Africa, The New York Times, 7/6/03)
Joe Wilson: What They Did, What The Office Of The Vice President Did, And, In Fact, I Believe Now From Mr. Libbys Statement, It Was Probably The Vice President Himself ... (CNNs Late Edition, 8/3/03)
Vice President Cheney: I Dont Know Joe Wilson. Ive Never Met Joe Wilson. And Joe Wilson - I Dont [Know] Who Sent Joe Wilson. He Never Submitted A Report That I Ever Saw When He Came Back. (NBCs Meet The Press, 9/14/03)
CIA Director George Tenet: In An Effort To Inquire About Certain Reports Involving Niger, CIAs Counter-Proliferation Experts, On Their Own Initiative, Asked An Individual With Ties To The Region To Make A Visit To See What He Could Learn. (Central Intelligence Agency, Statement By George J. Tenet, Director Of Central Intelligence, Press Release, 7/11/03)
Tenet: Because This Report, In Our View, Did Not Resolve Whether Iraq Was Or Was Not Seeking Uranium From Abroad, It Was Given A Normal And Wide Distribution, But We Did Not Brief It To The President, Vice-President Or Other Senior Administration Officials. (Central Intelligence Agency, Statement By George J. Tenet, Director Of Central Intelligence, Press Release, 7/11/03)
Wilson Denied His Wife Suggested He Travel To Niger, But Documentation Showed She Proposed His Name:
Wilson Claims His Wife Did Not Suggest He Travel To Niger To Investigate Reports Of Uranium Deal; Instead, Wilson Claims It Came Out Of Meeting With CIA To Discuss Report. CNNS WOLF BLITZER: Among other things, you had always said, always maintained, still maintain your wife, Valerie Plame, a CIA officer, had nothing to do with the decision to send to you Niger to inspect reports that uranium might be sold from Niger to Iraq. Did Valerie Plame, your wife, come up with the idea to send you to Niger? JOE WILSON: No. My wife served as a conduit, as I put in my book. When her supervisors asked her to contact me for the purposes of coming into the CIA to discuss all the issues surrounding this allegation of Niger selling uranium to Iraq. (CNNs Lade Edition, 7/18/04)
But Senate Select Committee On Intelligence Received Not Only Testimony But Actual Documentation Indicating Wilsons Wife Proposed Him For Trip. Some [CIA Counterproliferation Division, or CPD,] officials could not recall how the office decided to contact the former ambassador, however, interviews and documents provided to the Committee indicate that his wife, a CPD employee, suggested his name for the trip. The CPD reports officer told Committee staff that the former ambassadors wife offered up his name and a memorandum to the Deputy Chief of the CPD on February 12, 2002, from the former ambassadors wife says, my husband has good relations with both the PM [prime minister] and the former Minister of Mines (not to mention lots of French contacts), both of whom could possibly shed light on this sort of activity. (Select Committee On Intelligence, Report On The U.S. Intelligence Communitys Prewar Intelligence Assessments On Iraq, U.S. Senate, 7/7/04)
Wilsons Report On Niger Had Thin Evidence And Did Not Change Conclusions Of Analysts And Other Reports:
Officials Said Evidence Was Thin And His Homework Was Shoddy. In the days after Wilsons essay appeared, government officials began to steer reporters away from Wilsons conclusions, raising questions about his veracity and the agencys reasons for sending him in the first place. They told reporters that Wilsons evidence was thin, said his homework was shoddy and suggested that he had been sent to Niger by the CIA only because his wife had nominated him for the job. (Michael Duffy, Leaking With A Vengeance, Time, 10/13/03)
Senate Select Committee On Intelligence Unanimous Report: Conclusion 13. The Report On The Former Ambassadors Trip To Niger, Disseminated In March 2002, Did Not Change Any Analysts Assessments Of The Iraq-Niger Uranium Deal. (Senate Select Committee On Intelligence, Report On The U.S. Intelligence Communitys Prewar Assessments On Iraq, 7/7/04)
For Most Analysts, The Information In The Report Lent More Credibility To The Original Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Report On The Uranium Deal, But State Department Bureau Of Intelligence And Research (IN) Analysts Believed That The Report Supported Their Assessments That Niger Was Unlikely To Be Willing Or Able To Sell Uranium. (Senate Select Committee On Intelligence, Report On The U.S. Intelligence Communitys Prewar Assessments On Iraq, 7/7/04)
CIA Said Wilsons Findings Did Not Resolve The Issue. Because [Wilsons] report, in our view, did not resolve whether Iraq was or was not seeking uranium from abroad, it was given a normal and wide distribution, but we did not brief it to the president, vice president or other senior administration officials. We also had to consider that the former Nigerien officials knew that what they were saying would reach the U.S. government and that this might have influenced what they said. (Central Intelligence Agency, Statement By George J. Tenet, Director Of Central Intelligence, Press Release 7/11/03)
The Butler Report Claimed That The Presidents State Of the Union Statement On Uranium From Africa, Was Well-Founded. We conclude that, on the basis of the intelligence assessments at the time, covering both Niger and the Democratic Republic of Congo, the statements on Iraqi attempts to buy uranium from Africa in the Governments dossier, and by the Prime Minister in the House of Commons, were well-founded. By extension, we conclude also that the statement in President Bushs State of the Union Address of 28 January 2003 that: The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. was well-founded. (The Rt. Hon. The Lord Butler Of Brockwell, Review Of Intelligence, On Weapons Of Mass Destruction, 7/14/04)
Sens. Roberts, Bond And Hatch All Dismissed Wilsons Claims:
Sens. Pat Roberts (R-KS), Kit Bond (R-MO) And Orrin Hatch (R-UT) All Stated, On At Least Two Occasions [Wilson] Admitted That He Had No Direct Knowledge To Support Some Of His Claims And That He Was Drawing On Either Unrelated Past Experiences Or No Information At All. (Select Committee On Intelligence, Additional Views Of Chairman Pat Roberts, Joined By Senator Christopher S. Bond And Senator Orrin G. Hatch; Report On The U.S. Intelligence Communitys Prewar Intelligence Assessments On Iraq, U.S. Senate, 7/7/04)
The Former Ambassador, Either By Design Or Through Ignorance, Gave The American People And, For That Matter, The World A Version Of Events That Was Inaccurate, Unsubstantiated, And Misleading. (Select Committee On Intelligence, Additional Views Of Chairman Pat Roberts, Joined By Senator Christopher S. Bond And Senator Orrin G. Hatch; Report On The U.S. Intelligence Communitys Prewar Intelligence Assessments On Iraq, U.S. Senate, 7/7/04)
[J]oe Wilson Told Anyone Who Would Listen That The President Had Lied To The American People, That The Vice President Had Lied And That He Had Debunked The Claim That Iraq Was Seeking Uranium From Africa Not Only Did He NOT Debunk The Claim, He Actually Gave Some Intelligence Analysts Even More Reason To Believe That It May Be True. (Select Committee On Intelligence, Additional Views Of Chairman Pat Roberts, Joined By Senator Christopher S. Bond And Senator Orrin G. Hatch; Report On The U.S. Intelligence Communitys Prewar Intelligence Assessments On Iraq, U.S. Senate, 7/7/04)
Wilson Tied To The 2004 Kerry Campaign For President:
Wilson Endorsed Kerry In October 2003. Former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who accused the Bush administration of manipulating intelligence to exaggerate the threat from Iraq, endorsed Democrat John Kerry for president In a conference call with New Hampshire reporters, Wilson said he and Kerry have shared the experience of challenging their government Wilson when he questioned the rush to war with Iraq, Kerry when he challenged Americas role in Vietnam. (David Tirrell-Wysocki, Former Ambassador Wilson Endorses Kerry In Presidential Race, The Associated Press, 10/23/03)
Wilson Said He Has Long Been A Kerry Supporter And Has Contributed $2,000 To The Campaign This Year. He Said He Has Been Advising Kerry On Foreign Policy For About Five Months And Will Campaign For Kerry, Including A Trip To New Hampshire (David Tirrell-Wysocki, Former Ambassador Wilson Endorses Kerry In Presidential Race, The Associated Press, 10/23/03)
In Mid-May, [Wilson] Began Talking To Kerrys Advisers About Helping The Campaign; He Made His First Donation May 23. Kerry Himself Had Not Met Wilson Until Tuesday Night At A Campaign Fund-Raiser In Potomac, Md., A Kerry Aide Said (Patrick Healy and Wayne Washington, In Probe Of CIA Leak, Two Sides See Politics, The Boston Globe, 10/2/03)
[Kerry Advisor Rand] Beers Said Wilson Communicates With Campaign Advisers At Least Once A Week. (Patrick Healy and Wayne Washington, In Probe Of CIA Leak, Two Sides See Politics, The Boston Globe, 10/2/03)
He's going to keep digging until he concocts something on Rove.
What a whole lotta nuthin' this investigation is!
Did Berger testify before a Grand Jury? His case was handled as a misdemeanor by a Magistrate which I get the impression is something just above traffic court. Thanks to our career people in DoJ, Berger's case was a travesty of justice.
Sorry to interrupt, if you guys want to listen to Levin break the charges down with Victoria Toensig who put together the law... join us. Please bring your info and post also.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1511184/posts
http://www.wabcradio.com
You have done amazing work... may I steal it for the betterment of conservative spirits?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.