To: areafiftyone
It's not over yet. He'll charge Rove before he's through.
To: Minus_The_Bear
Dont' think so. He said he wanted to get this over with. I think he's going to indict a journalist!
6 posted on
10/28/2005 12:26:26 PM PDT by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
To: Minus_The_Bear
Looking at what he indicted Libby on, I can't even imagine how little he has on Rove.
Libby was basically indicted for remembering a conversation with Russert slightly differently than the way Russert remembered it.
8 posted on
10/28/2005 12:27:58 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Minus_The_Bear
"It's not over yet. He'll charge Rove before he's through." He'll have to - if one of those FBI files that Hillary illegally had upstairs in their private quarters pertained to Fitzgerald.
12 posted on
10/28/2005 12:29:06 PM PDT by
Matchett-PI
( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
To: Minus_The_Bear
"It's not over yet. He'll charge Rove before he's through."
I agree. If Karl Rove spits his gum out on to the ground at the White House, he'll have him charged for defacing government property.
21 posted on
10/28/2005 12:48:18 PM PDT by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: Minus_The_Bear
He'll charge Rove before he's throughNo, becase Rove was SMART ENOUGH to tell the truth. Let's face it, Libby is not the smartest tool in the shed if he lied as he did. I feel bad for him but he bought it on his own head.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson