Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dead
Libby was basically indicted for remembering a conversation with Russert slightly differently than the way Russert remembered it.

No. There is more to it than that.

20 posted on 10/28/2005 12:48:01 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Not really. The indictment pretty much spells it out.

He said/ he said. If they are gonna indict Libby...they need to indict Russert and Cooper.


22 posted on 10/28/2005 12:52:20 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
Not a whole lot. Russert disagrees with some of the content of his conversation with Libby. Cooper also disagrees with some of the content of his separate conversation with Libby.

What deep point am I missing beyond that?

35 posted on 10/28/2005 1:06:04 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

Well enlighten us.


72 posted on 10/28/2005 2:37:24 PM PDT by sgtyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson