Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rippin
So why isn't Russert indicted for contradicting Libby?

Because he did not, Libby he alleges called him as an upset viewer over something he had just seen on MSNBC and complained about a commentator. Russett said he would pass it on but why not call his bossess. Libby upset then asked if Tim knew of a Valerie Plame. Russett said he did not. Russett relayed this "upset viewer" at " a high level " then left on vacation to return to hear the buzz over the Wilson/Plame story written by Novak. Tim then said it hit him he was on the list of those Libby called and put two and two together. What upset Libby the possible "straw man" to make calls in the first place? Libby is loyal to whom ever he is working under and Tim Russett whether we like all he has to say is also considered a man of integrity. You would not want Russett on the stand contradicting what you had testified to.

Something happened to rattle Libby coming off from MSNBC to cause him to make the call complaining about a commentator, unless it was a bogus lead in complaint and I would not hope that Libby would intentionally do such a thing. Remember Libby was loyal to all those he has worked under or for-mention is made of that in the testimony for Marc Rich's innocence and end result his pardon.

64 posted on 10/30/2005 5:59:52 AM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Rippin

Sorry, in the post above I read your "contradicting" as "contacting" in my sugared up (halloween candy) brain this morning! But my comment to you does raise questions.


65 posted on 10/30/2005 6:02:43 AM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson