Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BikerNYC
In the context of a federal investigation and materially false statements are made to federal agents conducting the investigation, your statements don't even have to be under oath. Ask Martha.

And with no crime underneath? It's a crock, a "gotcha" investigation and indictment.

Fitzgerald was looking for a smoking gun and came up with a fly swatter.

532 posted on 10/28/2005 12:01:46 PM PDT by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
You can't lie to federal investigators. Period.

They may be investigating a crime and come to the conclusion that the evidence does not support charges. But if you lie to them in their investation, you lose. I personally think you should have to be under oath, but that's not the way it is.
540 posted on 10/28/2005 12:10:54 PM PDT by BikerNYC (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson