To: Moral Hazard
The implication of the charges seem to be that if there wasn't an investigation there wouldn't have been any crime at all.< cough >....you mean exactly like William Jefferson Clinton's crime of lying under oath, right?Getting hummers from interns in the Oval Office is no crime, but lying under oath is an impeachable offense.
IMO, don't go there.
429 posted on
10/28/2005 10:58:15 AM PDT by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
To: DCPatriot
"< cough >....you mean exactly like William Jefferson Clinton's crime of lying under oath, right?Getting hummers from interns in the Oval Office is no crime, but lying under oath is an impeachable offense.
IMO, don't go there."
There's arguably some similarities, but the Clinton ultimately settled the sexual harassment case that he committed perjury while testifying in, so presumably the suit had at least some validity. Also the lawsuit wasn't brought by the government in the first place.
448 posted on
10/28/2005 11:08:57 AM PDT by
Moral Hazard
("Now therefore kill every male among the little ones" - Numbers 31:17)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson