Read the link in post 13. Apparently there are enough parents who side with the school that they have volunteered to become assistants.
But I think they are all parent's of players on the team.
Personally, I have mixed feelings about this. I think the coaches were trying to force the administration to back the coach, and it didn't work.
But to hurt all the other kids on the team over the actions of the principle bothers me. If my son was on the team, and had a chance for a scholarship, I would be pretty upset of the coach and assistants all quit (violating a term of their contracts which required 60 days notice) right before a must-win game.
I'd be upset at the principal as well, but since I can't do anything about what SHE did I'm stuck with trying to help my son's team win so his chances of a career isn't shot.
In the pros, if a player is suspended they can appeal and their suspension is waived pending that appeal. I think that would have been something that could have been done here. The coach could have simply refused to play the player.
The player may deserve to be kicked off, but I think a player deserves to have a "day in court" before punishment.